| Me, at the Turf Tavern in Oxford |
I left many old boozers
undiscovered, but such is the nature of travel. You can’t see and experience
everything, but you explore what you can. Still, I didn’t want to jump on a jet
and just end this blog at a hard stop. But how to bring it in for a soft landing? I
suppose a ranking of pubs from most to least favored is simplest. Sure. Why not?
- The Seven Stars
- The Wrestlers
- The Spaniards Inn
- The Mayflower
- The Turf Tavern (Oxford)
- The Nags Head
- The Churchill Arms
- The George Inn
- The Guinea
- The Grapes
- The French House
- The Lamb & Flag
- Town of Ramsgate
- Ye Olde Cheshire Cheese
- Ye Olde Mitre
- The Old Nick
- Cittie of Yorke
- The Grenadier
- The Prospect of Whitby
- The Old Bell Tavern
- Hoop & Grapes
Then again, how much can
a list capture? Ranking has inherent problems. Defining something as the best
via loose criteria and then seeking it out often brings about less joy than
simply embracing the immediately accessible. Moreover, without an understanding
as to how a ranking was derived, the information it conveys is useless. To that
end, I’ve linked each pub to its respective post so my initial reflections can
provide some context.
However, those posts are
granular and disconnected. I think it worthwhile both for myself and my reader(s)
if I describe more generally my thoughts on my London Crawling project as a
whole.
Just to get this out of
the way, I realize you may find it pretentious of me to describe a travel blog
of a six-week pub crawl as a “project,” as though it were some grand scientific
undertaking. I wouldn’t describe the research within as particularly rigorous,
and though I clearly had fun with it, I also took it seriously. I meant what I
said in my introductory post when I described the pub as “a place where
humanity exercises its most phenomenal and foundational qualities,” namely
fostering connections and community with others.
Building on that point, the
better the pub contributed toward comradery, the higher it climbed on my list.
I assessed this feature through informal observations, mostly around three
questions:
- Do the employees enjoy each other’s company?
- Do the patrons enjoy each other’s company?
- Do the employees have a sense of the patrons as persons?
Even as a stranger in their midst, the environment was much more
welcoming when regulars were sprinkled in, and quirks and inside jokes shared
amongst the staff. It lent to a sense of uniqueness, to a feeling of something
special.
That uniqueness sadly
appears under threat. Major brewers own and operate many English pubs—Fuller’s,
Nicholson’s, Sam Smith, and Greene King being the most prominent ones from what
I saw. I give them credit regarding transparency. It’s very clear from the
signage who runs what, which is something I can’t say for similar conglomerates
back home. However, there’s a cold efficiency to the English pub system that
outmatches even our American tendencies.
Keeping in mind this is
informed only by personal observation, my sense is that the American model
hinges on variety. An owner of multiple bars can capture a wider market share
by diversifying the offerings and experiences of his or her establishments.
The English model leans
more toward uniformity. Take Greene King, for instance. It runs thousands of
establishments across the U.K., including the George Inn in London and the Turf
Tavern in Oxford. You would think two pubs 58 miles apart would be radically
different. In some ways they are, but in others, not so much. They have similar
branding, similar drink offerings, and the exact same food menus. While I like
both pubs, I can’t help but feel some of the charm has been sacrificed in
service to the conglomerate. As such, I tended to enjoy independent (or at
least independent-minded) pubs over their corporate cousins.
But as I said, I like the
George and the Turf. They’re Nos. 8 and 5 on my list, respectively. How can
this be? Mathematics offers the simplest answer. Most pubs I visited are tied
to a specific brewery, so some were bound to make the top choices. The more
complete answer revolved around people. To some extent, the comradery factor I
mentioned comes into play. More important, though, is that I visited these
places with friends and colleagues. All things being equal, the quality of the
company and the conversation are the great separators.
My wife, Chelsey, often
comments that I like bars not because I like to drink, but because I like to
talk. I think in part that’s a reprisal of my loquacious nature, but I own that
reality. I mean, fucking hell! I wrote over 11,000 words for a travel blog on London
pubs that maybe a dozen people will read—and I did it for fun. I clearly like
to spin a yarn.
But I also like to
listen. People fascinate me. We’re social animals, and the stories we tell and
the experiences we live through bind us together, for good or ill. Pubs serve as
grand gathering places, the last vestiges of the classical forum, the
cathedrals of companionship where life truly happens.
But alas, here we are at
closing time. “You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here,” the old
adage goes. Yet for homo sapiens—or perhaps, more aptly, homo socialis—few
places could feel more like home than the pub. Anyone fancy a pint?